Comments for Helvensteijn.com http://helvensteijn.com The glass is neither half full nor half empty; It is simply oversized Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:15:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on Source code in WordPress by Colin Helvensteijn http://helvensteijn.com/code/source-code-in-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-576 Colin Helvensteijn Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:15:55 +0000 http://helvensteijn.com/?post_type=code&p=1579#comment-576 Glad I could help. Glad I could help.

]]> Comment on Source code in WordPress by Maarten http://helvensteijn.com/code/source-code-in-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-575 Maarten Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:51:05 +0000 http://helvensteijn.com/?post_type=code&p=1579#comment-575 Removed line 278 and 282 and now it works, tanks! Removed line 278 and 282 and now it works, tanks!

]]> Comment on Source code in WordPress by Colin Helvensteijn http://helvensteijn.com/code/source-code-in-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-574 Colin Helvensteijn Thu, 15 Dec 2011 23:46:31 +0000 http://helvensteijn.com/?post_type=code&p=1579#comment-574 I think I know what's going wrong. On line 278 of your functions.php file, it checks to see for a custom post type of "code" (<code>if (is_singular('code')) {</code>) which I set up for my blog (so it doesn't have to run all that stuff on regular blog posts). You probably have no custom post type of "code" so the filters never run. You could either adjust the condition to something that meets your criteria, or remove the check altogether by commenting out/deleting lines 278 and 282 (but not the ones in between). I think I know what’s going wrong. On line 278 of your functions.php file, it checks to see for a custom post type of “code” (if (is_singular('code')) {) which I set up for my blog (so it doesn’t have to run all that stuff on regular blog posts). You probably have no custom post type of “code” so the filters never run.

You could either adjust the condition to something that meets your criteria, or remove the check altogether by commenting out/deleting lines 278 and 282 (but not the ones in between).

]]> Comment on Source code in WordPress by Maarten http://helvensteijn.com/code/source-code-in-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-573 Maarten Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:30:35 +0000 http://helvensteijn.com/?post_type=code&p=1579#comment-573 I'm using the latest WordPress (3.3) added SyntaxHighlighter (3.0.83) in the footer.php with SyntaxHighlighter.autoloader.apply (you can view my footer.php at http://pastebin.com/6eEdVyCL). In my functions.php (you can view it at http://pastebin.com/7Un1SwT5) I pasted your code. I don't use any other scripts. I’m using the latest WordPress (3.3) added SyntaxHighlighter (3.0.83) in the footer.php with SyntaxHighlighter.autoloader.apply (you can view my footer.php at http://pastebin.com/6eEdVyCL). In my functions.php (you can view it at http://pastebin.com/7Un1SwT5) I pasted your code.
I don’t use any other scripts.

]]> Comment on Source code in WordPress by Colin Helvensteijn http://helvensteijn.com/code/source-code-in-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-572 Colin Helvensteijn Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:45:29 +0000 http://helvensteijn.com/?post_type=code&p=1579#comment-572 Not without more info. It's working fine for me, and I don't really see why it wouldn't elsewhere. Not without more info. It’s working fine for me, and I don’t really see why it wouldn’t elsewhere.

]]> Comment on Source code in WordPress by Maarten http://helvensteijn.com/code/source-code-in-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-571 Maarten Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:01:24 +0000 http://helvensteijn.com/?post_type=code&p=1579#comment-571 Hi, I like the idea of this, but couldn't get it working. My [code] shortcodes stays visable, does nothing and the tabs are removed from the code. I got the SyntaxHighlighter working (tested with <pre class...). Can you please help me? Hi,

I like the idea of this, but couldn’t get it working. My [code] shortcodes stays visable, does nothing and the tabs are removed from the code. I got the SyntaxHighlighter working (tested with <pre class...).
Can you please help me?

]]> Comment on The trouble with 3D displays by Colin Helvensteijn http://helvensteijn.com/2011/09/26/the-trouble-with-3d-displays/comment-page-1/#comment-561 Colin Helvensteijn Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:13:24 +0000 http://helvensteijn.com/?p=1765#comment-561 Well, since stereoscopic 3D displays by definition require binocular vision, they don't provide any more information than a 2D display does to people who can only use one eye, that's true. For those people, the whole idea is kind of pointless. Well, since stereoscopic 3D displays by definition require binocular vision, they don’t provide any more information than a 2D display does to people who can only use one eye, that’s true. For those people, the whole idea is kind of pointless.

]]> Comment on The trouble with 3D displays by Patrick Bregman http://helvensteijn.com/2011/09/26/the-trouble-with-3d-displays/comment-page-1/#comment-560 Patrick Bregman Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:07:32 +0000 http://helvensteijn.com/?p=1765#comment-560 Another problem that I myself note is that when you only have 1 "active" eye so to say (both eyes have vision but you only "see" with one eye). This means that there is actually no definite way to have 3D vision. This is also true in real life, so the people who have this are probably disappointed by this a lot. I know it for myself, and find it a good reason to keep visiting 2D movies (the other reason is that 3D movies are just way too expensive ;) ). Another problem that I myself note is that when you only have 1 “active” eye so to say (both eyes have vision but you only “see” with one eye). This means that there is actually no definite way to have 3D vision. This is also true in real life, so the people who have this are probably disappointed by this a lot. I know it for myself, and find it a good reason to keep visiting 2D movies (the other reason is that 3D movies are just way too expensive ;) ).

]]> Comment on Idea on root privileges by Colin Helvensteijn http://helvensteijn.com/2011/05/03/idea-on-root-privileges/comment-page-1/#comment-547 Colin Helvensteijn Tue, 03 May 2011 21:14:31 +0000 http://helvensteijn.com/?p=1682#comment-547 Agreed. ;-) Agreed. ;-)

]]> Comment on Idea on root privileges by PatrickB http://helvensteijn.com/2011/05/03/idea-on-root-privileges/comment-page-1/#comment-546 PatrickB Tue, 03 May 2011 21:13:45 +0000 http://helvensteijn.com/?p=1682#comment-546 Yes, it is a bit higher level (the asking the user part) but the developer still has to set which permissions are used and the OS (or, in Androids case, the Dalvik VM) enforces that the app can only use those functions. Shall we just agree that it is strange that nothing like this is implemented yet? Yes, it is a bit higher level (the asking the user part) but the developer still has to set which permissions are used and the OS (or, in Androids case, the Dalvik VM) enforces that the app can only use those functions.

Shall we just agree that it is strange that nothing like this is implemented yet?

]]>